Every January, things heat up a bit as the annual Academy Award shortlist decisions draw closer. US online magazine Indiewire has taken the opportunity to ask some top-notch cinematographers which cameras and lenses they choose to snatch one of the prestigious award at the 94th Oscars.

You can’t go wrong if you choose only the best, as the saying goes…. but what is the best camera, let alone the myriad of possible lenses that can be combined with this best camera? When shooting a Hollywood feature film, in many cases the camera sports an ARRI sticker, but not always.


image credit: ARRI

If you’re a cinematographer on a major Hollywood production, budget is usually not the limiting factor in choosing the best camera. Your vision (and that of the director) should be the guiding factor when it comes to choosing one camera over another. In 2002, “28 Days Later” by Danny Boyle (DP: Anthony Dod Mantle) was shot in part with a Canon XL1 DV camera, not because it’s a great camera, but because it was a perfect fit for the look and feel they wanted.

94th Oscars contenders – Camera and lens choices


So here are some examples of interesting choices that several DPs have made to achieve the look they want:

• “Dune” Dir: Denis Villeneuve // DoP: Greig Fraser
  • Format: Large format digital anamorphic and open gate spherical
  • Camera: ARRI ALEXA LF
  • Lenses: Panavision Ultra Vista Anamorphics; Panavision H series spherical

According to DP Greig Fraser the team tested both film and digital cameras to get the look just right. Although classic film seemed to feel too nostalgic, the digital images out of the Alexa felt a bit too digital. The solution was to combine the digital camera with vintage glass (Panavision H series) and slightly newer Ultra Vista Anamorphics.

• “The French Dispatch” Dir: Wes Anderson // DoP: Robert Yeoman
  • Format: 35mm film; 5213 for color, 5222 for black and white
  • Camera: ArriCam ST; ArriCam LT
  • Lenses: Cooke S4’s for the spherical 1.37 sequences; Arriflex Master Anamorphic for the anamorphic 2.40 sequences

Classic film cameras ain’t dead as it seems! Yeoman states that he and director Wes Anderson already used the Cooke S4’s on “The Grand Budapest Hotel” and both of them simply fell in love with the look so they kept using them on this project as well.


image credit: ARRI AG – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0

In regards to the Master Anamorphics Yeoman states that is was essential to be able to get actors in focus even on the edge of the frame so he went with these high-end anamorphics.

• “The Matrix Resurrections” Dir: Lana Wachowsky // DoP: Daniele Massaccesi and John Toll
  • Format: 4K
  • Camera: RED Ranger
  • Lenses: Panavision

According to Daniele Massaccesi, the team wanted to “find a new look, to create a Matrix reality that looked more real that the reality itself.” A bold claim, but with the original “The Matrix” movie being more than 20 years of age, things have obviously changed, and since this franchise has always been visually challenging, this latest movie is no exception.


image credit: RED

• “The Green Knight” Dir: David Lowrey // DoP: Andrew Droz Palermo
  • Format: ArriRaw Opengate 6.5K
  • Camera: ARRI Alexa 65
  • Lenses: Arri DNA

• “CODA” Dir: Sian Heder // DoP: Paula Huidobro
  • Format: Sony VENICE 6k
  • Camera: Sony VENICE
  • Lenses: Arri Signature LF primes

image credit: Sony

• “The Hand of God” Dir: Paolo Sorrentino // DoP: Daria D’Antonio
  • Format: 8K HD Redcode Raw
  • Camera: RED DSMC2 Monstro
  • Lens: Arri Signature Prime lenses

• “No Time to Die” Dir: Cary Joji Fukunaga // DoP: Linus Sandgren
  • Format: 35mm anamorphic 4-perf; IMAX 70mm 15-perf; 65mm 5-perf
  • Camera: Panavision XL2; IMAX MSM; IMAX MKIV; Panavision System 65; Arri 765; Arri 435; Arri 235
  • Lens: Panavision G-series anamorphic; IMAX Hasselblad

This is of course just a short excerpt from the full list over on Indiewire, please be sure to read the full article, it’s well worth it!

ARRI all the way?


Once again, many DPs rely on the ARRI brand, either using one of the many ALEXA variants or shooting with older but still very capable film cameras like the ArriCam ST & LT. But RED is also getting in on the action, especially with the introduction of the Ranger camera, the company seems to be attracting the attention of some cinematographers on high-end feature film productions.

But the list also includes large and heavy Panavision and even IMAX systems. For productions where money is no object, it’s really about the look and feel, not so much about the dollars spent.

Source: Indiewire
featured image credit: Oscars.org (background and logo)

What do you think? Can you already name the one feature film that should win a trophy at the 94th Oscars? Let us know in the comments below!

The post The Cameras and Lenses Behind the 94th Oscars Contenders appeared first on CineD.